Search

Oscars' TV audience dropped to 26.5 million - an all-time low

It's thought the Oscars' decline could be attributed to the fact there's been year of political activism hitting the ...

It's thought the Oscars' decline could be attributed to the fact there's been year of political activism hitting the show, turning off viewers.

Hollywood's biggest night that celebrates the best in movies over the last year is becoming a smaller attraction for TV viewers.

The audience for American TV Channel ABC's annual telecast of the Oscars declined for a fourth consecutive year, according to Nielsen data, dropping to an all-time low of 26.5 million viewers.

The dip of nearly 20 per cent from last year put it under the previous low of 32 million in 2008, which came following an 11-week Hollywood writers' strike that crippled other awards shows.

The steep decline for the 90th Academy Awards can partly be attributed to the challenge that all major television events face: the emergence of streaming online video.

READ MORE
* Oscars 2018 - a vanilla, tedious let down
* Curious case of lost and found Oscar
* What is an "inclusion rider"?

The statistic did not escape the notice of US President Donald Trump.

"Lowest-rated Oscars in HISTORY," he tweeted Tuesday morning. "Problem is, we don't have Stars anymore -- except your President (just kidding, of course)!"

After mostly ignoring Hollywood for months, Trump seems to be making up for lost time lately, firing off tweets at Alec Baldwin for his "terrible impersonation" on Saturday Night Live and a "very insecure" Oprah Winfrey on Twitter.

His recent uptick in trolling is reminiscent of the early days of his administration when he dissed Meryl Streep as "one of the most over-rated actresses in Hollywood" following her Golden Globes speech and asked attendees at the National Prayer Breakfast to pray for better ratings for his Celebrity Apprentice successor, Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The MeToo and TimesUp movements were part of the annual event this year, leading to a feeling of politicising.

The MeToo and TimesUp movements were part of the annual event this year, leading to a feeling of politicising.

As for the Oscars themselves, the industry's started speculating on what may be to blame.

Ad Feedback

With so many programming options, even a major awards telecast that is perennially the most-watched entertainment program of the year is no longer an automatic default choice for viewers.

Younger viewers are also showing a tendency to watch highlights of major TV events on social media platforms rather than watch a program in real time on television.

Not even Helen Mirren and a Jetski promise could halt the slump in Oscar ratings.

Not even Helen Mirren and a Jetski promise could halt the slump in Oscar ratings.

The Oscars, hosted for the second consecutive year by ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, is not the only perennial program being hit by the changes in viewing habits.

The Grammy Awards on CBS were down 24 per cent this year to 19.8 million viewers - its lowest audience level in nine years, while NBC's telecast of Super Bowl LII was off 7 percent to 103.4 million viewers, the lowest total since 2009.

Even with those drops, the events deliver massive numbers of viewers that used to regularly be delivered by the biggest hits in prime time before proliferating choices started slicing and dicing the audience.

The declines in the Oscars are probably exacerbated by the voting members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences who have tended to celebrate smaller movies and resisted nominating blockbusters.

The 2018 winner for best picture, The Shape of Water, has earned a modest $78.66 million at the box office in the United States and Canada - a figure that is actually higher than the previous four winners.

Ratings for the Oscars have been better when the movies were bigger.

The most-watched telecast was in 1998, when ABC had an audience of 55.2 million viewers the night all-time box-office champ Titanic won for best picture.

"I think that next year if Black Panther is nominated for best picture the ratings will go up," said media consultant and former network executive Preston Beckman, referring to the critically lauded superhero mega hit currently in theatres.

Beckman added that the academy's move to expand the number of nominees from five to as many as 10 has only given more attention to art house fare that much of the public is unfamiliar with.

ABC, which has the rights to the Oscars through 2028 and was able to command more than $2 million for a 30-second commercial on the telecast, declined comment on the ratings decline. But privately executives said they are hoping that more popular films can get nominated in the future.

Although the show generally stayed away from overt attacks on the Trump administration - a frequent target for Hollywood - the political nature of the Oscars ceremony may have alienated some viewers as well, industry watchers said.

"Every year there seems like there is an issue that Hollywood has chosen to lecture the country on," Beckman said.

"When the viewing public feels that Hollywood is going to use this to forward its own political agenda there is a significant part of the country that is going to say, 'I'm not going to sit here for four hours and be lectured to.' "

This year the #MeToo and Time's Up movements exposing and combating sexual harassment in the entertainment industry were front and centre, even during the red carpet entrances before the show.

Red carpet host Ryan Seacrest, who is battling allegations that he sexually harassed and assaulted a stylist who worked for him, was unable to get cooperation from most of the big name nominees during his annual pre-Oscars program on E! - in effect dampening the viewer enthusiasm for the ceremony. Seacrest has denied the accusations against him.

Conservative commentators on cable news, often critical of Hollywood's devotion to liberal causes, revelled in the Oscar ratings decline, saying that portions of the program sounded like a sexual harassment training seminar.

At one point during the show, lead actress winner Frances McDormand finished an otherwise emotional tribute to the other female nominees with the term "inclusion rider," referring to a contractual clause that requires a specific level of diversity in the cast and crew of a project.

Even with the decline in ratings, however, the Oscars remain special because the telecast is watched live and viewers sit through the commercials.

That gives it a big edge in the advertising marketplace, as scripted programming is increasingly watched on a DVR, on demand or an online stream.

Although ABC will probably be hard pressed in future years to get the 10 per cent price increase it reportedly was able to command this year, advertisers are likely to still pay a premium to run spots on the telecast as the number of places to reach large live-TV audiences continue to diminish.

"If I'm buying an ad on the Oscars there is a very good chance the viewer is going to see the ad," Beckman said. "That increases the value of it."

- Los Angeles Times, Stuff

Do you think it's time to ditch the Oscars? What kind of awards ceremony would you like to see? Tell us in the comments!

Let's block ads! (Why?)



Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "Oscars' TV audience dropped to 26.5 million - an all-time low"

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.